Top of the Heap

Compost Studios:

A blog devoted to the art of reducing, reusing, and recycling experience through words, images, and poetry.


Backdoor
The Producers
Powered by Squarespace
Smallproud1

 

Copyright 2005-2009
Veronica McCabe Deschambault, V-Grrrl in the Middle, Compost Studios. All rights reserved. Content may not be posted or broadcast online or in other media without written permission. Link all you want!
« Art Journal | Main | Coming to This »
Monday
09Jun

Charlie Wilson's War

Recently released on DVD, Charlie Wilson's War features an impressive cast of Academy Award winners. Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and Phillip Seymour Hoffman deftly bring to film three real-life characters who had a far-reaching effect on world politics. The film is based on a book with the same title.

Charlie Wilson, played amiably by Tom Hanks, is a Texas Congressman better known for his drinking, womanizing, and sexy office staff than for his political pull or savvy. He may have many character flaws, but he's far smarter than he looks, and this assessment can be applied to the other key players in the story as well.

Julia Roberts as Houston socialite Joanne Herring has a sharp mind and pointed foreign policy opinions inside her perfectly coiffed blond head.  She uses her intellect, considerable physical charms and social standing to expand her influence far beyond Texas.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman plays the hot-headed, straight talking CIA agent Gust Avrakotos, a man who is frustrated after watching his career sidelined by his lack of smoothness and diplomacy.

In 1979, the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan was in the news but not on Congress' agenda. Ultra-conservative Joanne Herring is determined to stop the spread of communism and deal with the humanitarian disaster unfolding there. She introduces Charlie to her cause, sending him into a tense and uncomfortable meeting with the president of Pakistan which ultimately leads to the brokering of an unlikely and secret alliance between Pakistan,  Egypt, Israel, and the U.S.

Charlie is responsible for finding the funding for a covert operation to equip the Afghan rebels with the weaponry needed to defeat the Soviets. Gust and his team provide the intelligence and expertise to monitor its success behind the scenes.

Ultimately, against all odds, the Soviets are forced to retreat by the Afghans. The defeat of the Soviet Union was a stunning blow that depleted both the resources and morale of the Soviet military machine. It is widely considered a key event in the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Sadly, the victory becomes bittersweet for Charlie, Joanne, and Gust when they're unable to raise funds or generate interest in rebuilding Afghanistan after the war, paving the way for the rise of the Muslim extremists who would figure prominently in the 9/11 attacks and the establishment of a global terror network.

I didn't expect to like this movie as much as I did. The movie was surprisingly funny, entertaining, and watchable. The comic moments had me laughing hard, the scenes set in Afghanistan were sobering, the acting and complex characters made the film believable.

It was both horrifying and intriguing to consider how a covert operation triggered a series of events that changed the face of world politics in such a far reaching way. It's unnerving as well as reassuring to know that smart people can exert considerable influence even when no one recognizes their power.

Charlie Wilson's War reveals how complex foreign policy is, the danger of seeking or settling for an "easy" solution, and both the effectiveness and weaknesses of covert operations. I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news. I don't always have the patience to absorb, digest, and consider the impact of events that seem a world away from my life, my country. We count on journalists to uncover and communicate the news that matters. When they succeed in nailing down a story, is anyone, including myself, listening to what they have to say?

Charlie Wilson's War is a reminder to pay attention, to invest time in trying to uncover and understand the short and long-term impact of  U.S. foreign policy at home and abroad, and to realize that "ordinary" people can and do make a difference, whether they're in Congress or at a party in Texas.

June 9, 2008


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (12)

I've been wanting to see this one. Frankly, I only had a vague idea of what it was about. It did look clever, slick, and amusing, but I had no idea it had this much depth. It's always interesting to see how little it takes to start dominoes on their fall. I was just reading about the butterfly effect and how even the tiniest variable can have huge impacts. Thanks for the review. I'll definitely check it out.
June 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterShirley
I had thought of seeing this, but mostly I thought it looked somewhat boring. I'm really glad you reviewed it so well, because now I'll rent it. :)

I've worked with several Afghanis in my career, and they all bemoan the terrible fate of their beautiful county. It's anguish, really.
June 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJ
V, "we count on journalists to uncover and communicate the news that matters" is indeed a very important point. We can't be there, so we trust journalists who we should be able to trust.

And often, we can't trust them. They have an hidden agenda or their network is being under a lot of political pressure to "cut and paste" the war news.

As I'm living in Belgium, the difference in reporting between the many US, European and non-European networks regarding "international" news is staggering.

Just take a look at Fox (they'd sell their dead mother to get viewers), CNN, the BBC, a Belgian network or El Jazeera in English: totally different views on the same stories.

I enjoyed your "I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news." statement.
Trust me, we Europeans know ;-)

While you're an intelligent woman with a journalistic background, having lived in Europe, I'm often stunned noticing that some US visitors in Antwerp seem totally unaware of the world outside their borders.

June 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterPeter
One of my favorite films V...I like the part when the Soviet Hind-24 helicopters meet the Afghans learning to use the Stinger missle system.

Great movie, but like journalism itself, it's all an entertainment business. Always has been and always will be. Even First Amendment zealots like Ben Franklin were open and honest about this feature of public communication.

A word to your pal Peter......Broadcast news, print media are all businesses with competing financial demands of capital, labor, the pressures of the market. European outlets don't do it any better. They just have a broader international market...perhaps something about their much longer and far more wretched colonial past than the United States.

Belgium, France, Britain, and yes even the peaceful Dutch, all have their own international connections to Africa and South East Asia. The historic record of these nation's political behavior and exploitive economic practices makes the United States look princely.

Smugly, modern day 21st century Western Europeans live in within a relatively peaceful political economy. It's easy to mock the United States, it's people, and its sometimes sheer goofiness. But recognize that this stability is relatively new to Europe over the last 400 years.

This stability is in large part by the political and financial will of the United States in the last 60 years to ensure European security.
June 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMichael
You did a great job in this review.
When I saw this movie I had such a feeling of frustration about the parallels runing right now, with the war we are in now. The end of this movie just KILLED me, that people were SO short sighted, when a few were trying to speak reason. And it all came down to money and comfort, really. We got what we wanted, and no one wanted to spend any more.

This war is different, obviously, because it was all so sketchy to start with.(in my strong oppinion, we should have---once again!-- finished our work in Afghanistan before we did ANYthing else). But I worry that that fact seems to be enough to most people to "just get the hell out". I have a deep worry in my gut about how we get out, and the mess it WILL leave if we do it wrong. I hope people can learn from history...But I doubt it. I think emotion will win the day, and not logic.

Peter--"I enjoyed your "I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news." statement.
Trust me, we Europeans know ;-) "

--Not true for ALL Americans. Thanks.Many of us pay MUCH attention. I can make myself sick from over load and frustration, at times. I have to cut myself off so I don't have a stroke... And I doubt ALL Europeans eagerly lap up information to the degree they wish (we believed) they did, either. ;)

:)


June 10, 2008 | Unregistered Commenteramber
Michael, the only historically exploitive economic practice of Belgium has been Congo (Zaire), our only colony that gained independence in the early 60s. But it used to flourish (yes, there were many abuses) and totally fell apart when Belgium left. Now, 45y later, Congo is a humanitarian disaster.

I'm not mocking the US (most of you have European roots anyway ;-), but I just point to the fact that all large nations have a tendency to look inward. Living in a tiny kingdom by the sea we hardly have a chance to look inward, we're just too small.

I notice you're referring to the post WW-II Marshal plan, for which many Europeans are still grateful.


Amber, most of my US friends are intelligent and know their world. Just look at the number of US multinationals around Brussels and their associated expats. But sometimes I bump into a clueless Southern Belle roaming Antwerp while exclaiming "look at these cobblestone streets! I just can't imagine living here!" :-)

You can find equally clueless Belgians roaming NY city, I'm sure.

I did however found it remarkable to watch CNN Europe (from London, aimed at a EU audience) vs the US national version: the international angle changed drastically.

Quoting V's original post: 'a reminder to pay attention, to invest time in trying to uncover and understand the short and long-term impact of U.S. foreign policy at home and abroad' seems appropriate here.

I also understand that with the ongoing war in Iraq many US civilians are fed up with any criticism and easily feel attacked.
There's no need to. Most of us can quite easily make the distinction between "a temporary US administration" and US citizens.

June 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterPeter
Oh my. I'm not going to attempt to sort my thoughts/feelings into words here. I am wimping out on you. Just know, to be sure, you have again inspired thought, conversation, and contemplation. For me, this is the best of what writing is capable of. Thanks V.
June 10, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterimpy
Yeah...I thought I was just going to let that movie slip on by, but now? Maybe not.
June 10, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterapathy lounge
Hello! I have been lurking around the blogosphere again!

I wondered if the movie was good, it got decent reviews. I will make sure I see it. That you for the insight into the movie and your thoughts around it.
June 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDenice
Hey Denice!

Welcome back! I'll have to pop over to your place. It's been AGES.
June 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterV-Grrrl
I just finished watching this movie and it was very good. Yes, very interesting how things unfold. One has to wonder what the course of history would be had Charlie Wilson NOT been able to convince Congress to appropriate the funds for this operation (even if he couldn't carry it through to the needed conclusion). Muslim extemists/terrorists OR Soviet Union "occupation"/"spreading"... History is certainly so much clearer in textbooks and hindsight. I can't help but think about the current situations in Iraq and Afghanistan and wonder what the end results will be. Frankly, I don't see any good long-term outcomes (I know "positive" examples are often lauded), but I wonder just how bad the ultimate results will be.
June 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterShirley
Peter-- "Most of us can quite easily make the distinction between "a temporary US administration" and US citizens."--

That is a relief. lol!

;)
June 18, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterAmber

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.