Reviews Charlie Wilson's War
June 9, 2008 at 05:45 Recently released on DVD, Charlie Wilson's War features an impressive cast of Academy Award winners. Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and Phillip Seymour Hoffman deftly bring to film three real-life characters who had a far-reaching effect on world politics. The film is based on a book with the same title.
Charlie Wilson, played amiably by Tom Hanks, is a Texas Congressman better known for his drinking, womanizing, and sexy office staff than for his political pull or savvy. He may have many character flaws, but he's far smarter than he looks, and this assessment can be applied to the other key players in the story as well.
Julia Roberts as Houston socialite Joanne Herring has a sharp mind and pointed foreign policy opinions inside her perfectly coiffed blond head. She uses her intellect, considerable physical charms and social standing to expand her influence far beyond Texas.
Phillip Seymour Hoffman plays the hot-headed, straight talking CIA agent Gust Avrakotos, a man who is frustrated after watching his career sidelined by his lack of smoothness and diplomacy.
In 1979, the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan was in the news but not on Congress' agenda. Ultra-conservative Joanne Herring is determined to stop the spread of communism and deal with the humanitarian disaster unfolding there. She introduces Charlie to her cause, sending him into a tense and uncomfortable meeting with the president of Pakistan which ultimately leads to the brokering of an unlikely and secret alliance between Pakistan, Egypt, Israel, and the U.S.
Charlie is responsible for finding the funding for a covert operation to equip the Afghan rebels with the weaponry needed to defeat the Soviets. Gust and his team provide the intelligence and expertise to monitor its success behind the scenes.
Ultimately, against all odds, the Soviets are forced to retreat by the Afghans. The defeat of the Soviet Union was a stunning blow that depleted both the resources and morale of the Soviet military machine. It is widely considered a key event in the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Sadly, the victory becomes bittersweet for Charlie, Joanne, and Gust when they're unable to raise funds or generate interest in rebuilding Afghanistan after the war, paving the way for the rise of the Muslim extremists who would figure prominently in the 9/11 attacks and the establishment of a global terror network.
I didn't expect to like this movie as much as I did. The movie was surprisingly funny, entertaining, and watchable. The comic moments had me laughing hard, the scenes set in Afghanistan were sobering, the acting and complex characters made the film believable.
It was both horrifying and intriguing to consider how a covert operation triggered a series of events that changed the face of world politics in such a far reaching way. It's unnerving as well as reassuring to know that smart people can exert considerable influence even when no one recognizes their power.
Charlie Wilson's War reveals how complex foreign policy is, the danger of seeking or settling for an "easy" solution, and both the effectiveness and weaknesses of covert operations. I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news. I don't always have the patience to absorb, digest, and consider the impact of events that seem a world away from my life, my country. We count on journalists to uncover and communicate the news that matters. When they succeed in nailing down a story, is anyone, including myself, listening to what they have to say?
Charlie Wilson's War is a reminder to pay attention, to invest time in trying to uncover and understand the short and long-term impact of U.S. foreign policy at home and abroad, and to realize that "ordinary" people can and do make a difference, whether they're in Congress or at a party in Texas.
June 9, 2008


Reader Comments (12)
I've worked with several Afghanis in my career, and they all bemoan the terrible fate of their beautiful county. It's anguish, really.
And often, we can't trust them. They have an hidden agenda or their network is being under a lot of political pressure to "cut and paste" the war news.
As I'm living in Belgium, the difference in reporting between the many US, European and non-European networks regarding "international" news is staggering.
Just take a look at Fox (they'd sell their dead mother to get viewers), CNN, the BBC, a Belgian network or El Jazeera in English: totally different views on the same stories.
I enjoyed your "I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news." statement.
Trust me, we Europeans know ;-)
While you're an intelligent woman with a journalistic background, having lived in Europe, I'm often stunned noticing that some US visitors in Antwerp seem totally unaware of the world outside their borders.
Great movie, but like journalism itself, it's all an entertainment business. Always has been and always will be. Even First Amendment zealots like Ben Franklin were open and honest about this feature of public communication.
A word to your pal Peter......Broadcast news, print media are all businesses with competing financial demands of capital, labor, the pressures of the market. European outlets don't do it any better. They just have a broader international market...perhaps something about their much longer and far more wretched colonial past than the United States.
Belgium, France, Britain, and yes even the peaceful Dutch, all have their own international connections to Africa and South East Asia. The historic record of these nation's political behavior and exploitive economic practices makes the United States look princely.
Smugly, modern day 21st century Western Europeans live in within a relatively peaceful political economy. It's easy to mock the United States, it's people, and its sometimes sheer goofiness. But recognize that this stability is relatively new to Europe over the last 400 years.
This stability is in large part by the political and financial will of the United States in the last 60 years to ensure European security.
When I saw this movie I had such a feeling of frustration about the parallels runing right now, with the war we are in now. The end of this movie just KILLED me, that people were SO short sighted, when a few were trying to speak reason. And it all came down to money and comfort, really. We got what we wanted, and no one wanted to spend any more.
This war is different, obviously, because it was all so sketchy to start with.(in my strong oppinion, we should have---once again!-- finished our work in Afghanistan before we did ANYthing else). But I worry that that fact seems to be enough to most people to "just get the hell out". I have a deep worry in my gut about how we get out, and the mess it WILL leave if we do it wrong. I hope people can learn from history...But I doubt it. I think emotion will win the day, and not logic.
Peter--"I enjoyed your "I confess that like most Americans, I tend to skim over international news." statement.
Trust me, we Europeans know ;-) "
--Not true for ALL Americans. Thanks.Many of us pay MUCH attention. I can make myself sick from over load and frustration, at times. I have to cut myself off so I don't have a stroke... And I doubt ALL Europeans eagerly lap up information to the degree they wish (we believed) they did, either. ;)
:)
I'm not mocking the US (most of you have European roots anyway ;-), but I just point to the fact that all large nations have a tendency to look inward. Living in a tiny kingdom by the sea we hardly have a chance to look inward, we're just too small.
I notice you're referring to the post WW-II Marshal plan, for which many Europeans are still grateful.
Amber, most of my US friends are intelligent and know their world. Just look at the number of US multinationals around Brussels and their associated expats. But sometimes I bump into a clueless Southern Belle roaming Antwerp while exclaiming "look at these cobblestone streets! I just can't imagine living here!" :-)
You can find equally clueless Belgians roaming NY city, I'm sure.
I did however found it remarkable to watch CNN Europe (from London, aimed at a EU audience) vs the US national version: the international angle changed drastically.
Quoting V's original post: 'a reminder to pay attention, to invest time in trying to uncover and understand the short and long-term impact of U.S. foreign policy at home and abroad' seems appropriate here.
I also understand that with the ongoing war in Iraq many US civilians are fed up with any criticism and easily feel attacked.
There's no need to. Most of us can quite easily make the distinction between "a temporary US administration" and US citizens.
I wondered if the movie was good, it got decent reviews. I will make sure I see it. That you for the insight into the movie and your thoughts around it.
Welcome back! I'll have to pop over to your place. It's been AGES.
That is a relief. lol!
;)